It’s a given that new technologies will continue to redefine how teachers teach and students learn, but which ones will be important in the coming school years. Will they be smaller and lighter computers, new ways to show visuals to a class or something we can’t even think of at the moment? Only time will tell.
This month I asked our panel of school IT pros to gaze into the educational crystal ball to see what the future might hold in store.

John Orbaugh
Director of Technology Services
Tyler Independent School District
Tyler, Texas
I believe the challenges we will face over the next three years will revolve around putting more engaging technology into the hands of our students and opening access to instructional applications while at the same time increasing security and controlling costs. All in all that is a pretty difficult task. I expect that we will see virtual desktops and cloud computing technology grow rapidly as we strive to meet these challenges.
We have completed the virtualization of our district’s file servers, built a storage area network to house the programs and data and introduced a Web portal to begin granting secure access. Our next step will be to convert our standard desktop PCs into a thin client devices that give our users access to a virtual desktop.
Kurt Madden
Chief Technology Officer
Fresno Unified School District
Fresno, California
There are new technology products for the classroom nearly every day. Some will have a significant impact, but others will no impact – or even worse, a negative impact. I think that almost any technology that is “forced” on a school tends to be negative.
In addition, I’m not a big fan of document cameras because they tend to keep teachers paper-based, although some teachers use them effectively for other reasons. Also , there are still some districts that put desktop models (vs. laptops) into classrooms and labs which I think has a negative impact on the classroom in terms of noise, heat, energy costs and the physical space they take up.
The problem with prediction is that you are wrong as often as you are right. Regardless, if I were to pick, the following technologies (I can’t pick just one) will have the most impact on the classroom:
The netbook –
By having a laptop small enough to share the desktop with textbooks and paper, the netbook provides a transition strategy from the paper-based classroom to the digital-based classroom. With the content of the world online, the netbook provides a window into the resources of the world.
The wireless pad/tablet –
This allows the teacher, for the first time in 80 years, to move away from the blackboard/whiteboard/overhead projector screen/interactive board at the front of the room and walk around to interact with students. This freedom allows the teacher to move around the room and observe what students are doing while controlling what is projected on the front of the room.
The digital portfolio –
The digital portfolio captures student’s learning during their years in primary and secondary grades. Student achievement is more than grades and tests – it also includes the artifacts of student learning.
John Laws
Executive Director for Technology
Lakota School District
West Chester, Ohio
There is the answer I would like to provide because I think it would deliver the capability we all desire: 1-to-1 programs. Unfortunately given the severe budget constraints at the State and local levels this is a blurry vision at best. In our case I see student owned PCs making their way into the classrooms, increased reliance on cloud-based functionality for things from file storage to Office applications and slow steady improvements on applications for Smartphones.
Smartphones with a network capability will allow use of these devices connected to our managed network services. Couple this with creative entrepreneurs delivering instructional content with all the bells and whistles (standards-based, engaging and integrated) and our teachers will explode with new ways to engage and challenge the students. Some would say this is available now, but we’re held back by a lack of hardware standards, the limited applications and public opinion that prohibits us from providing a handheld device to those who cannot afford one. In other words, smaller more capable hardware will be the game changer over the next three to five years.
While I think the vendors would like us to think they have moved all the needed instructional software online I’ve found the majority of the offerings are remakes of software for the 1990s. I’ve yet to see comprehensive software with an intuitive interface and an open capability to tie in multiple vendor products that works for the K-12 market.
I need to add that Lakota School District has been fortunate to have hardware-refresh money for the past five years. We have gigabit Ethernet throughout the district, interactive white boards in 90 percent of our classrooms and 100 percent in core areas as well as a variety of online applications for student instruction. Yes we are a spoiled bunch!
At some point I think we’re going to need to get out of the PC purchasing business and get into the wireless application delivery business. Think of schools working like iTunes U; an interesting concept.
Trudy LeDoux
Technology Director
Dickinson Independent School District
Dickinson, Texas
Dickinson ISD has spent much effort in providing a solid IP infrastructure for which to deliver data across the district. With the reliable infrastructure in place, we are now prepared for advanced technologies that will allow for collaboration between students and between personnel.
To date, Dickinson ISD has no video conferencing in the classroom, and we have few approved Web 2.0 tools in place. Our goal is to acquire and implement these tools for instructional purposes
Let me know what you think about this question and feel free to suggest another for next month.